Report a comment

Thank you for taking the time to report the following comment to the administrator of this site.
Please complete this short form and click the submit button to process your report.

Name:
 
E-mail
 
Reason for reporting comment
 
 
 

Comment in question
Written by Maria on 30-04-2005 01:34 - Guest
 
 
Dear All,

First of all - the above article and discussion depict in a very interesting manner the process of scandal creation. The process very common even on countries' level, involving journalists - who pick up only some issues, leaving out the other ones and then coming up to the public opinion, which is obviously outraged (presented with overblown and spicy extremes)- everything due to misinformation or partial information.

Now to the point: I would again like to repeat after Deyan. The Parliament has been working on improving it's EFFICIENCY (also through improving its structure) during extended sessions on Sunday evenings! During regular meetings the structure proposal has barely been discussed. Therefore, concerns that the Parliament is again only working on improving it's structure are out of place.
As for the proposal on changing the structure itself (it's not even a proposal as pointed out by prof. Bogaards). Adina, Bilyana, Tadas, Rytis and Dimitar did a good job devoting a lot of their time to identifying problems and finding solutions. We should keep in mind that every new suggestion has positive and negative sides to it. Now there is time to discuss these points in the Parliament, make a decision and proceed with current work benefiting from new improvements in the structure as soon as possible.